Tales of the Parodyverse - Re: An amazing compilation. Nice job!

Post By

In Reply To

Hatman

Member Since: Thu Jan 01, 1970
Posts: 618

Subj: Re: An amazing compilation. Nice job!
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 at 10:50:02 pm EDT

Reply Subj: An amazing compilation. Nice job!
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 at 10:43:22 pm EDT (Viewed 1036 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Next >>

> The links to more info on Hatman are pretty out of date (and the Hatility Belt one doesn't work). I think they could be removed, and I could write a more recent bio if you like.

I deliberatly skipped over most of the stuff about active poster characters on the assumption that they could probably come up with stuff themselves, so a revised entry would be most welcome. I'll take a look at the broken link when I get to the next set of corrections. A few folks have said they'll add some updates.

> Would you like me to do more fleshed out entries for Doorman, Harvester, Gamma Ray Gary, and D'ur Acell (I guess I could do one for DupliKate too)?

I don't see why not. If they're too long to use in the main body we can always add them as link pages. One useful addition would be a surname for Kate. I couldn't find one when I looked.

Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows 2000

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Who's Who in the Parodyverse? version 15.4 · Because some people actually wanted it, although nobody ever really expected it, including... the Hooded Hood! · Sat May 10, 2008 at 10:10:43 pm EDT
- Wait! I'm in here? Me? (no text) · champagne is honored · Mon May 19, 2008 at 07:43:35 pm EDT
- That's... an awful lot of Parodyverse! :-0 · Dancer can't believe you did this!!!!! · Sun May 18, 2008 at 07:13:29 am EDT
  - A frightening amount, yes. And there's plenty more that didn't make the cut. (no text) · HH · Mon May 19, 2008 at 10:03:22 am EDT
- An amazing compilation. Nice job! · Hatman · Wed May 14, 2008 at 10:43:22 pm EDT
  - Re: An amazing compilation. Nice job! · HH · Wed May 14, 2008 at 10:50:02 pm EDT
    - Re: An amazing compilation. Nice job! · Hatman · Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:23:12 pm EDT
- I was thinking this was in need of an update... · L! · Sun May 11, 2008 at 11:31:58 pm EDT
  - That seemed to the the consensus, yes. (no text) · HH will have another run at amendments in a day or two when others have had a chance to join in · Mon May 12, 2008 at 09:22:24 am EDT
- An impressive update! · Visionary · Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:04:01 pm EDT
  - You realise we have more than 500 characters in there? · HH · Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:38:20 pm EDT
    - You realise that you probably have yourself mostly to blame? · Visionary probably only created 15 characters on there, tops. · Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:56:21 pm EDT
      - My best calculation leaves me only 40% to blame · HH used to be 50% to blame, so things are getting better · Mon May 12, 2008 at 09:25:51 am EDT
        
        Really? Where'd all the new characters come from? · Visionary · Tue May 13, 2008 at 11:20:03 pm EDT
        
        Everybody else, · HH · Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:00:42 pm EDT
- I suppose I should work on my entry, then ... (no text) · CrazySugarFreakBoy! notes that April is slightly more than his "current girlfriend" anymore. :) · Sun May 11, 2008 at 06:00:27 am EDT
  - Re: I suppose I should work on my entry, then ... · HH had rewritten that but forgot to restore it after a computer crash yesterday wiped out half an hour's work · Sun May 11, 2008 at 07:40:59 am EDT
- You are absolutely mad to have done this. · killer shrike, with more constructive criticism within · Sat May 10, 2008 at 10:54:48 pm EDT
  - Re: You are absolutely mad to have done this. · HH · Sat May 10, 2008 at 11:01:17 pm EDT
    - Re: You are absolutely mad to have done this. · killer shrike · Sat May 10, 2008 at 11:25:41 pm EDT
      - Re: You are absolutely mad to have done this. · HH · Sat May 10, 2008 at 11:33:52 pm EDT
        
        Re: You are absolutely mad to have done this. · killer shrike · Sat May 10, 2008 at 11:39:18 pm EDT
        
        Corrected. (no text) · HH · Mon May 12, 2008 at 09:36:50 am EDT
- Woo! (That was quick.) (no text) · Nats · Sat May 10, 2008 at 10:34:20 pm EDT
  - In no sense of the word was this "quick". (no text) · HH · Sat May 10, 2008 at 11:02:03 pm EDT