Tales of the Parodyverse

Post By

In Reply To

Moderator

Member Since: Sat Jan 03, 2004
Posts: 2,131

Subj: Toot-toot!
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 04:09:52 pm EST (Viewed 2 times)

Reply Subj: I have to applaud the "Thomas" answer. Spot-on.
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 01:06:25 pm EST (Viewed 639 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Next >>

Quote:

Quote:
Considering that the HBO show is full of sex, violence and nudity, it's likely considered inappropriate for their age. They have to wait for their caphan histories to get their fill of that.

Quote:

With Griff's ability to tear through the internet ignoring all firewalls?

Quote:

Leave a parent his comfortable charade.

Noted.

Quote:

I was put off by the pre-publicity stories about casting calls for actors who wouldn't mind playing sex furniture and performing various simulated erotic acts, and by some of the "we'll be even raunchier than Game of Thrones"-type marketing that led me to conclude it was all going to be rather juvenile and exploitative.

Quote:

I'm not aware of those stories myself, but the end product doesn't match that impression, at least for me. Most of the nudity was of the non-sexual variety... quite likely still there for some titillation and a general "Hey, look what we can do on cable!" kind of thing, but still. Much of it reminded me of life-drawing classes, as the robots were completely unclothed when being examined or worked on by technicians, simply sitting in chairs or standing like mannequins... The in-story justification being that clothing them out of a respect for modesty played into dangerous anthropomorphic thoughts in the people that worked on them.

http://io9.gizmodo.com/wtf-hbo-leaked-westworld-consent-form-makes-game-of-t-1734027938
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/westworld-sexually-explicit-casting-contract-828287

Quote:

That said, there are still some sex scenes scattered about as well... but I wouldn't say they reached a "raunchier than Game of Thrones" bar... even if the marketing people might have liked them to attempt it.

It's quite possible that given the negative media - and union - attention, somebody was told to take a cold shower.

Quote:

I've heard enough positive things now that I'll probably give it a try if it ever comes to some platform I can legally access.

Quote:

I think that it's well worth the watch, but again... it's focused on themes I tend to like.

Who doesn't like clothing-optional A.I.s?.

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 50.0 on MacOS X

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Adaptation Issues · Visionary · Mon Dec 05, 2016 at 03:11:30 pm EST
- Re: Adaptation Issues [Spoilers] · Jack · Fri Dec 09, 2016 at 02:05:25 am EST
  - Re: Adaptation Issues [Spoilers] · Visionary · Fri Dec 09, 2016 at 11:34:48 pm EST
- Re: Adaptation Issues · J. Jonah Jerkson · Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 09:33:36 am EST
  - The all-body snake tattoo would look good on her. (no text) · Visionary · Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 12:48:53 pm EST
- It ended pretty much the way every scene with Vizh does. · Anime Jason · Tue Dec 06, 2016 at 11:58:46 am EST
  - To be fair, a good number of them start the same way too. · Visionary · Tue Dec 06, 2016 at 02:13:57 pm EST
- James Marsden is perfect casting really · Al B. Harper · Tue Dec 06, 2016 at 07:14:18 am EST
  - I admit, he does nail the "wait... what's going on?" expression well in this. · Visionary · Tue Dec 06, 2016 at 02:22:40 pm EST
    - Re: I admit, he does nail the "wait... what's going on?" expression well in this. · Al B. Harper · Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 05:55:57 am EST
      - Re: I admit, he does nail the "wait... what's going on?" expression well in this. · Visionary · Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 01:58:24 pm EST
        
        Re: I admit, he does nail the "wait... what's going on?" expression well in this. · Al B. Harper · Thu Dec 08, 2016 at 04:02:58 am EST
        
        Re: I admit, he does nail the "wait... what's going on?" expression well in this. · Visionary · Thu Dec 08, 2016 at 11:49:46 pm EST
        
        Re: I admit, he does nail the "wait... what's going on?" expression well in this. · Al B. Harper · Fri Dec 09, 2016 at 06:05:50 am EST
- Is this more of a "soft reboot" or a "reimagining"? (no text) · killer shrike enjoyed it nonetheless · Mon Dec 05, 2016 at 05:35:26 pm EST
  - The in-Parodyverse version is probably some legal action waiting to happen. · Visionary · Mon Dec 05, 2016 at 08:04:49 pm EST
- The Parodyverse really doesn't have enough heroic steam trains. Yet. · HH · Mon Dec 05, 2016 at 05:09:04 pm EST
  - Does any universe? · Visionary · Mon Dec 05, 2016 at 08:17:09 pm EST
    - The world of Thomas the Tank Engine? Or the Little Train Who Can? The Cannonball Express? · HH notes Thomas' recent team-up with Ant Man · Tue Dec 06, 2016 at 06:12:57 pm EST
      - I have to applaud the "Thomas" answer. Spot-on. · Visionary · Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 01:06:25 pm EST
        
        Toot-toot! · HH · Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 04:09:52 pm EST
        
        Re: Toot-toot! · Visionary · Wed Dec 07, 2016 at 05:02:10 pm EST