 |
|
| Tales of the Parodyverse >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Reply Subj: Captain America: Civil War Review (no spoilers at the top, spoilers below the break) Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 at 02:06:16 pm EDT (Viewed 2 times) | |||||||
Quote: I was less than enthused when Marvel Studios announced that the content of Captain America 3 would be Civil War. I’d genuinely have preferred the Serpent Society. It appears that the decision to go with heroes fighting was made in response to Warner Brothers announcing Batman v Superman: The Dawn of Justice and Kevin Feige’s opinion that Marvel therefore needed to “up our gameâ€... Cap 3 has an insanely huge cast. It’s a tribute to the production team from writers to camera operators to the actors that each character has his or her own moment to shine and most have good two-hander scenes; and yet the focus remains on the guy whose name appears in the title. I find this interesting, because the major complaint I have heard with Batman vs Superman is that it tries to stuff too many storylines into one film. Quote: The film isn’t perfect. The main villain is a generic revenge-driven baddie with a famous name pasted over him. He might as well have been called Colonel Schemey McVengeful rather than waste a well-established and distinctive Avengers villain identity. The ending felt downbeat, with quite a lot still to resolve that won’t be addressed for several movie instalments to come. Still nobody has shouted “Avengers Assemble!â€The - admittedly little - I have seen of the MCU seems to have this as a common failing. The villains don't seem to be quite there (Loki in Avengers was an exception). On the other hand, I have enjoyed the films I have seen. | |||||||
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 46.0 on Windows 7
| |||||||
| |||||||
| On Topic™ © 2003-2024 Powermad Software |
