> > Well, this certainly puts us in a pickle. I think Hatman would latch onto that "future is always changing" remark made just before he's told the odds of Danny becoming the Moderator as hope that maybe Danny won't turn on the Parodyverse. I think you covered Hatman's reactions pretty well here so I don't think I need to elaborate further; the statement "we can't punish someone for something they may do" sums it up.
>
> So Hatty's not one of the "time-travel back and kill Hitler as a baby" crowd. But there's still a few decisions he has to make:
>
> How much of the Chronicler's assertion does he pass on to the LL? To the governments of the world?
>
|
The govts should know, yeah. They're the ones whose job it is to determine threats to national security and how to approach dealing with them, with input from the heroes of course.
> Who makes the call about Danny's future? Hatty? LL vote? SPUD? The UN?
>
|
The UN? Hahahhahaha!
The federal court system seems the best avenue to dispense justice.
> Is Danny allowed to wake up and speak in his own defence?
>
|
If there's some way to negate his powers. Of course, if his powers could be removed, there probably wouldn't be a need to kill him
> Who explains all this to Kerry, and how? Who pays for the damage afterwards?
>
|
Visionary
> What if the Chronicler seeks to sanction Danny? Will the LL defend him?
>
|
Probably
> What if the Chronicler seeks to remove the Nexus from Earth, leaving Earth vulnerable to dying in sub-plots, robbing it of its destiny? Would the LL battle to stop the Chronicler?
>
|
I don't see much heroism in the Legion fighting to make sure their world is the center of the universe. That's a bit too meta for me.
I do find it interesting that the responses we've seen have been very authoritarian and ani-democratic. The Legion is becoming more and more crypto-fascist with each passing day....
