Tales of the Parodyverse >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Reply Subj: Re: Publishing and Software Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 at 11:53:46 pm EST (Viewed 433 times) | |||||||
Quote: Generally with software I've already finished it, or have some kind of prototype - because I'm absolutely against raising money for something I have no chance of delivering. So most of the costs are actually gone already, except for advertising/marketing, where I have no idea even how to estimate it.It's not an product I have a great deal of experience in so I can;t really advise you. You might start by looking into whether there is a freebie demo version possible, and then release that via sites like CNET. Quote: What's scary is, Traders is nowhere near complete. It's just started. See why I thought maybe posting a one-chapter preview here might be interesting?if that's what keeps you writing that's what you do. Quote: World Class is also just started, but has less going on at the beginning.As long as it hooks the reader and keeps them turning the pages. Quote: Quote: Returning to a previous point, when you are ready you need to get in two or three beta-readers. Quote: I actually know someone who's pretty good at nit-picking, but she's not an experienced professional book editor or anything. Just a heavy reader who's picky.Experiences professional book editors are expensive. I've never had one. Small press editors tend to be variable in quality, some good and others not so good. For most it is not a full-time job, just as many of their authors are not full time. My experience is that most do not dig very deep in their editing, usually staying with imposing house style on grammar and offering occasional text amendments. The rule of thumb in small press and self-publishing is that you will probably be your own best and strictist editor. And proofreader. And promoter. Beta readers aren't editors. They're half proofreaders and half focus group. If there are bits of story they didn't understand then you know which parts need revision. If there are character choices they don't buy then you have to either change the plot or work harder to sell the twist. They are the canaries in your coal mine. Mostly the PVB doesn't - or didn't - work too well as a beta site. Posters here are mostly supportive, reluctant to criticise hard work. It's a different audience feedback. There's also the "silent response" which is hard to interpret - apathy, dislike, just too busy to read it? On a couple of occasions when I had more time I did major beta reads and editorial passes at work-for-publication that posters here had prepared. It's a time-consuming job, painful for me and the writer. But there are places on the internet that offer that level of critique and even some that offer it positively and effectively. When you are ready - by which I mean a full first draft of something done from start to end - then you may wish to seek them out. I'm a bit worried I'm getting overbearing and pedantic on this topic so I'll wind up there. | |||||||
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 42.0 on Windows XP
| |||||||
|
On Topic™ © 2003-2024 Powermad Software |