Tales of the Parodyverse >> View Post
·
Post By
L!

Location: Seattle, Washington
Member Since: Sun Jan 04, 2004
Posts: 1,038
In Reply To
Hatman

Member Since: Thu Jan 01, 1970
Posts: 618
Subj: And it's not... *further text inside*
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 at 12:22:24 pm EDT (Viewed 422 times)
Reply Subj: I actually disagree with her assessment, it didn't strike me as being overtly sexual at all
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 at 09:02:14 pm EDT (Viewed 447 times)


... It's more that the painting might be of an overtly sexual nature & is up in a place where children frequent.

I'm not sure I stated this in the story but Catherine didn't seem to object to the painting it self just that it was up in the store. She was probably just trying to protect J.J. from those parents that might avoid the store after seeing the painting up.




Posted with Apple Safari 5.0 on MacOS X
On Topic™ © 2003-2024 Powermad Software
Copyright © 2003-2024 by Powermad Software