Tales of the Parodyverse >> View Thread |
Author | |
Visionary Moderator Member Since: Sat Jan 03, 2004 Posts: 2,131 |
Subject: So, what are the opinions on "Watchmen"? Posted Mon Mar 09, 2009 at 10:28:55 pm EDT (Viewed 524 times) |
| |
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.7 on Windows Vista
I saw it this weekend and generally liked it. Definitely a far more faithful adaptation, for better or worse, than I would have ever expected could come about. I'd say that in presenting the cliff's notes version of the story the most notable loss were all the characters that weren't superheroes... All of the man on the street stuff has been dropped. Cops, the news vendor and kid, the editor of the paper, most of the psychiatrist, etc. If it didn't directly involve one of the "Watchmen" (as the movie named them), then the scene was dropped. Understandable, but then it does make the big attack at the end fairly hollow without knowing anyone caught in it. All told though, I liked it. I do think that, for someone who hasn't read the comic, it would be much like the Harry Potter movies are to me: There's a fair amount of interesting stuff, but the overall story of each movie itself isn't particularly great, and I just figure that there was a lot more on the page that make the stories worth telling... the details that suck one into the adventure and make it such a treat. | |
CrazySugarFreakBoy! Member Since: Sun Jan 04, 2004 Posts: 1,235 |
Subject: I will be taking the folks and a family friend to see it this weekend. [Re: Visionary] Posted Tue Mar 10, 2009 at 01:37:09 am EDT (Viewed 448 times) |
| |
Posted with Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 on Windows Vista
Word 'round the campfire is that Zack Snyder already has an extra half-hour's worth of footage ready to be reinserted into the film for the "director's cut" edition on DVD - all the stuff that he fought the studio (and lost) to try and include - so I suspect we might be seeing the news vendor and the kid, at least. I've heard VERY encouraging things about Rorschach, from both fans of Moore and newcomers to Watchmen. It occurs to me that, in some sense, CSFB! is the non-right-wing, non-misogynistic (and hopefully non-hygiene-challenged) version of Rorschach. | |
HH |
Subject: I may have to sneak Rhiannon in to see it. [Re: Visionary] Posted Tue Mar 10, 2009 at 06:36:43 pm EDT |
| |
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows 2000
Quote: I saw it this weekend and generally liked it. Definitely a far more faithful adaptation, for better or worse, than I would have ever expected could come about. I'd say that in presenting the cliff's notes version of the story the most notable loss were all the characters that weren't superheroes... All of the man on the street stuff has been dropped. Cops, the news vendor and kid, the editor of the paper, most of the psychiatrist, etc. If it didn't directly involve one of the "Watchmen" (as the movie named them), then the scene was dropped. Understandable, but then it does make the big attack at the end fairly hollow without knowing anyone caught in it. All told though, I liked it. I do think that, for someone who hasn't read the comic, it would be much like the Harry Potter movies are to me: There's a fair amount of interesting stuff, but the overall story of each movie itself isn't particularly great, and I just figure that there was a lot more on the page that make the stories worth telling... the details that suck one into the adventure and make it such a treat. | |
Jack |
Subject: I thought it was alright; I didn't get to see the last twenty min because the projector died. [Re: Visionary] Posted Tue Mar 10, 2009 at 06:59:26 pm EDT (Viewed 4 times) |
| |
Posted with Apple Safari 3.2.1 on MacOS X
| |
Messenger |
Subject: A completely different experience than the book. [Re: Visionary] Posted Wed Mar 11, 2009 at 06:49:51 am EDT (Viewed 2 times) |
| |
Posted with Apple Safari 3.2.1 on MacOS X
It's enjoyable if you can separate the book from the movie and not always be comparing the two. I got a thrill seeing some of my favorite scenes come to life, and yes, a little letdown when some other favorite scenes were either left out, changed or just fell flat. It was its own creature though. Undeniably inferior to the book, but very entertaining in its own limited way if you can accept it for what it is.... which is, pretty much the best possible adaptation of a graphic novel that is at its core unfilmable. I have a bunch of complaints that aren't fair considering the limitations of placing this beast on the silver-screen. My only REAL complaint that could have been avoided, was I didn't care for the slow motion shots and the large, over-the-top *THWACK* sound effects every time a fight occurred. I thought it should have been done in a more low-key, realistic way, keeping more instep with Moore's "heroes in a real world" motif. I think Greengrass would have done a better job with the fights (look at his documentary-esque footage of the fights with the hijackers in United 93... no loud sounds, no crazy contortions of the body, no blurring effects, no slow motion.... just two bodies slamming hard into each other). Besides that relatively minor complaint, Snyder did the best job one could do in adapting this. | |
killer shrike wanted more of both Ozymandias and Hollis Mason |
Subject: Better than expected, certainly. Though my two favorite characters got the short shrift [Re: Visionary] Posted Wed Mar 11, 2009 at 10:20:22 pm EDT (Viewed 1 times) |
| |
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista
| |
CrazySugarFreakBoy! Member Since: Sun Jan 04, 2004 Posts: 1,235 |
Subject: My ideal choices for Adrian and Hollis would have been Redford and Heston, but only as they were 20 years ago. [Re: killer shrike wanted more of both Ozymandias and Hollis Mason] Posted Thu Mar 12, 2009 at 12:31:40 am EDT (Viewed 370 times) |
| |
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 4.0; on Windows Vista
|
On Topic™ © 2003-2024 Powermad Software |