Tales of the Parodyverse >> View Thread

Author
Visionary 

Moderator

Member Since: Sat Jan 03, 2004
Posts: 2,131

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.6 on Windows Vista


I haven't read the book by Neil Gaiman, but I really enjoyed the movie adaptation. The animation is impressive already, but in 3-D it becomes a real experience. They don't do a lot of "poke you in the eye" effects (aside from a needle coming through a cloth at the very beginning, almost to show they *could* do it.) They do, however, take advantage of the depth of spaces, and as a result the rooms the characters inhabit pull you right in with them. Plus, since it's stop-motion, the rooms actually exist (albeit in miniature form). Compared to CGI, it really makes a subtle but interesting difference in the look.

All of the previews were for 3-D CGI movies by comparison... they looked cool but slick. (Although the 3-D will really make a difference for Disney/Pixar's "Up", as looking at the flying house with the ground far below you *really* felt the height.) I think I kind of like this new take on an old gimmick in filmmaking.

Really stupid looking glasses came with this one though... Giant old man glasses. Make sure your date isn't too judgmental.




Al B. Harper



Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP

I think it was 1988 I saw the last one - at World Expo 88 here in Brisbane - ahh the 80s.

It was in the Fujitsu pavilion. Can't remember much more than that - except some old lady trying to reach out and grab things.

And really, funny glasses are par for the course aren't they? \:\)

Al B.




L!


Location: Seattle, Washington
Member Since: Sun Jan 04, 2004
Posts: 1,038

Posted with Apple Safari 3.2.1 on MacOS X

I might try & go see it. I don't really get out to see Movies in the theaters much.

I always found 3D glasses cumbersome since I wear glasses in my every day life I've found it hard to keep the those glasses on my face so the effect has never really worked for me.




Goldeneyed


Member Since: Thu Jan 01, 1970
Posts: 83

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.6 on MacOS X

>
> I haven't read the book by Neil Gaiman, but I really enjoyed the movie adaptation. The animation is impressive already, but in 3-D it becomes a real experience. They don't do a lot of "poke you in the eye" effects (aside from a needle coming through a cloth at the very beginning, almost to show they *could* do it.) They do, however, take advantage of the depth of spaces, and as a result the rooms the characters inhabit pull you right in with them. Plus, since it's stop-motion, the rooms actually exist (albeit in miniature form). Compared to CGI, it really makes a subtle but interesting difference in the look.
>
> All of the previews were for 3-D CGI movies by comparison... they looked cool but slick. (Although the 3-D will really make a difference for Disney/Pixar's "Up", as looking at the flying house with the ground far below you *really* felt the height.) I think I kind of like this new take on an old gimmick in filmmaking.
>
> Really stupid looking glasses came with this one though... Giant old man glasses. Make sure your date isn't too judgmental.





CrazySugarFreakBoy!


Member Since: Sun Jan 04, 2004
Posts: 1,235

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.5 on MacOS X






Goldeneyed


Member Since: Thu Jan 01, 1970
Posts: 83

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.6 on MacOS X





Visionary 

Moderator
thinks this is Selick's best film.

Member Since: Sat Jan 03, 2004
Posts: 2,131

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.6 on Windows Vista





HH



Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows 2000


    Quote:

    I haven't read the book by Neil Gaiman, but I really enjoyed the movie adaptation. The animation is impressive already, but in 3-D it becomes a real experience. They don't do a lot of "poke you in the eye" effects (aside from a needle coming through a cloth at the very beginning, almost to show they *could* do it.) They do, however, take advantage of the depth of spaces, and as a result the rooms the characters inhabit pull you right in with them. Plus, since it's stop-motion, the rooms actually exist (albeit in miniature form). Compared to CGI, it really makes a subtle but interesting difference in the look.

    All of the previews were for 3-D CGI movies by comparison... they looked cool but slick. (Although the 3-D will really make a difference for Disney/Pixar's "Up", as looking at the flying house with the ground far below you *really* felt the height.) I think I kind of like this new take on an old gimmick in filmmaking.

    Really stupid looking glasses came with this one though... Giant old man glasses. Make sure your date isn't too judgmental.






On Topic™ © 2003-2024 Powermad Software